The biggest insult I can give this movie is that it reminds me of something my friends and I would have made when we were in junior high playing around with the 3D movie maker on the computer. To say this movie is terrible is an insult to every terrible movie ever made. Other than some cool looking zombies, I found nothing else redeeming about this movie.
First off, there’s the poor costume design. This is something I usually never comment on, but it’s so noticeable bad in House of the Dead that something has to be said. Poor Clint Howard plays a sailor, but he looks more like a school crossing guard on a rainy day. Howard could have been very creepy here, but he looks so goofy that it’s hard to take anything he says seriously.
Then there’s the sailor in the flashback who looks like Captain Crunch. I mean it was dumb enough to try and tell the audience that someone back then came up with a formula for zombies, but it’s even dumber when you have the mad scientist zombie guy murdering Captain Crunch. May be that beloved breakfast cereal holds the secret to stopping the zombie menace one and for all…
Here are some questions I bet the director, Uwe Boll, never thought about. Why can the lead zombie talk? I know he’s the scientist that created the zombie formula, but why is he able to stay so intelligent? As well, how is he controlling the zombies? I can’t help but wonder too, why the rave on the island is sponsored by Sega? I wish I could find a picture of this, but if you watch this movie you’ll notice a big Sega sign at the rave. Is the lead zombie the head of Sega Incorporated? Is this perhaps some sort of social commentary someone snuck into the film? Or is it that Boll thought it would be a cool inside joke because Sega produced the House of the Dead games? Of course, I use the word “joke” loosely in that last question.
For some reason Boll loved using the same shot of a zombie hand clutching to a tree trunk. I really don’t understand that at all. It doesn’t help either that clips from the video game are randomly inserted throughout the entire movie. Did they know that the movie was so bad that they put clips from the game in it just to try and fool people into thinking they were watching something good? Then there’s the weird camera angles/shots that I think are taken from the games. They add nothing to the movie and I would assume that these shots would just confuse the hell out of any viewers not familiar with the video games. The worst of it is that they’re not even consistent. Some characters get death scenes that are reminiscence of deaths in the video games while others don’t. It’s like they wanted this movie to be just like the video game without realizing that a movie is fundamentally different from a video game.
The characterization is terrible as well. All the characters are forgettable and most of them are unappealing. It has to be the best example of shallowness I’ve ever seen when we see Rudy worrying about his ex-girlfriend being at the rave with someone else while trapped on an island with an army of zombies. There’s one scene that is just the characters shooing zombies for ten minutes or more. This scene isn’t too bad, but it does start to get boring as the endless supply of zombies starts to seem goofy. I mean if the mad scientist zombie guy has this many zombies, why does he stay on that island? Wouldn’t it be easier for him to raid a boat and take over a nearby town/city and slowly take over the world?
It doesn’t help that the house in this movie is just there because it’s in the title of the video game. I mean where did the house come from? Did the mad scientist zombie guy build it? Actually a better question would be: where does he get his supplies to keep making the zombie formula? Thinking about these plot holes is starting to make my head hurt…